<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fruitful faith &#187; What Darwin Got Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/tag/what-darwin-got-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net</link>
	<description>exploring the challenge of trusting &#38; obeying Jesus...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>lazy bash</title>
		<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2010/02/lazy-bash/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lazy-bash</link>
		<comments>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2010/02/lazy-bash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the god delusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Darwin Got Wrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a nice parallel between Dawkins&#8217; less-than-informed rant against theism in The God Delusion (God would have to be very, very complex, because I, Richard Dawkins, zoologist, say so) and the recent apparently less-than-informed &#8216;refutation&#8217; of evolutionary theory by Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini in What Darwin Got Wrong.</p> <p>Will the people defending Dawkins (a la &#8216;Must he hold a theology degree <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2010/02/lazy-bash/">lazy bash</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a nice parallel between Dawkins&#8217; less-than-informed rant against theism in <em>The God Delusion</em> (God would have to be very, very complex, because I, Richard Dawkins, zoologist, say so) and the recent <a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2010/02/14/new_critique_intends_to_rebut_darwins_ideas/?page=1">apparently less-than-informed</a> &#8216;refutation&#8217; of evolutionary theory by Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini in <em>What Darwin Got Wrong.</em></p>
<p>Will the people defending Dawkins (a la &#8216;Must he hold a theology degree before he can critique it!?&#8217;) lend the same defense to the authors of this new work (&#8216;Must the authors bother to interact with evolution as actually understood by evolutionists!?&#8217;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2010/02/lazy-bash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

