lazy bash

There’s a nice parallel between Dawkins’ less-than-informed rant against theism in The God Delusion (God would have to be very, very complex, because I, Richard Dawkins, zoologist, say so) and the recent apparently less-than-informed ‘refutation’ of evolutionary theory by Fodor and Piattelli-Palmarini in What Darwin Got Wrong.

Will the people defending Dawkins (a la ‘Must he hold a theology degree before he can critique it!?’) lend the same defense to the authors of this new work (‘Must the authors bother to interact with evolution as actually understood by evolutionists!?’)?