Discussions about the nature/essence of reality lie behind discussions about goals/ends, which lie behind discussions about morality/ethics.
Or – ontology precedes teleology which precedes ethics.
Or – οντος → τελος → ηθος
Posted in ethics, philosophy
Tagged ethics, morals, ontology, pretending to know greek, teleology
The word ‘teleology’ (from Greek τελος ‘telos’ – meaning ‘goal’, ‘end’, ‘purpose’ or ‘that toward which things tend’) is not a street-level term. However, the concept of a purpose, goal, function or ‘end’ to things most certainly is. It’s a common as anything. Teleology is blindingly relevant.
Posted in ethics, philosophy
Tagged abortion, advertising, art, belief, busyness, change, community, conflict, consumerism, creation, dignity, ethics, evil, god, humanity, Law, life, love, morals, order, pain, peace, philosophy, politics, relationships, science, sexuality, spirituality, technology, wisdom
In a very interesting find, this is a site of atheists (and agnostics) who are pro-life.
I think their arguments are (mostly) excellent, though of course it would be interesting to a) see how non-pro-life atheists would respond to them, and b) converse with them concerning things like how they determine (judge/establish/discover) the nature of human worth/value/dignity.
The effects and pervasiveness advertising is a good example of both the power and fragility of the imagination.
We are (almost always subconciously!) actually affected by some hyper-loud voice telling us something in the ad-breaks of whatever TV show we’re watching or by some image we see on a billboard, in a magazine, etc., etc. ad infinitum… That is how fragile our imaginations are.
And we act, behave, decide, spend-time/money, choose, etc. ‘out of’ our imagination. We buy ‘this’ or ‘that’ product based (often) on nothing but our imaginitive affection for it… That is how powerful our imaginations are.
This is a double edged sword. Great strides in medicine, architecture, physics, art, education, etc., etc. have been made because someone ‘imagined’ a different way. Also great pain has been caused in marriages, families, communities and nations because one or more people ‘imagined’ that that woman, experience, possession, ideology or whatever would be desirable, fun, cool or powerful.
Take an affair for example. They don’t just ‘happen’. A man/woman must first enjoy the company of someone other than their spouse. Imaginitive step after imaginitive step are taken. And boom – there you have it – an affair.
This appreciation of (and respect for) the power and fragility of the imagination is what should drive all concerns about things like pornography, boobs-on-bikes parades and modesty, etc., etc. Sooooo often, they are often driven by what seems like an assumption that if we could just get the laws sorted out to how we think they should be, people will behave like we think they ought…
…leaving the power and fragility of the imagination (the heart of the issue) untouched, un-dealt-with, un-appreciated… and not solving any problems whatsoever.
Posted in ethics, philosophy
Tagged advertising, discernment, imagination, life, morals, porn, relationships, spirituality, temptation, wisdom
interesting example here: a woman thanking ‘that drunk girl’ for (among other things) showing her how not to act at a party.
…that a video game like this even exists.
Posted in ethics, philosophy
Tagged current event, dignity, ethics, evil, humanity, morals, sexuality, tolerance
This morning, a Breakfast programme discussed the less-than-commendable notion of borrowing funds to invest during a recession…
…and my wife just now walked in the door from a work-leaving do (for non-NZ readers, ‘do’ means ‘event’ or ‘party’), which involved walking through the Sky City building, and mentioned how surprised she was to see how busy the casino was.
Interesting.
Tagged culture, current event, ethics, life, morals, temptation, wisdom
Prof. John Stackhouse’s post (here) on the recent “bus campaigns” is quite good and balanced I think.
Apparently, the board of a Vancouver bus company has the following regulation on bus ads:
“No advertisement will be accepted which promotes or opposes a specific theology or religious ethic, point of view, policy or action.” Continue reading
Posted in philosophy, www
Tagged atheism, belief, consumerism, culture, current event, ethics, life, morals, religion, worldview
Anyone who has a knee jerk (i.e. less than critical) reaction to political events in general and the recent U.S. stimulus package in particular, should shut up and think before ranting.
That said, I just don’t like the thought (much less the passing) of the new stimulus package (and I’m not at all anti-Obama – to be crystal clear). $US838 BILLION – on what I can’t help but see as a kind of massively over-sized whallop to a horse that is eventually going to die. Yes, I’m aware of the complexity to all this, and No, I don’t think there are any quick fixes. But I still cannot understand or begin to support spending nearly a trillion dollars on trying to preserve the “American Way of Life” ™.
What kind of precedent are we setting for future generations? What are we saying to the rest of the world – much of which is living in some mild or severe form of poverty; a different kind of poverty indeed to the ‘poverty’ some are facing in ‘developed’ nations around the world.
Some may think, “Oh, but financial prosperity for the ‘rich west’ will enable them to be generous to the ‘poor rest’…” That kind of capitalistic mentality (a.k.a. ‘the rising tide will lift many small boats’) is utter Bull. Greed does not engender generosity.
Instead of our bank account levels needing to go ‘up’, we need our standard of living to go ‘down’ to a realistic and sustainable place. And as long as ‘going out and spending money to stimulate the economy’ is part of doing your ‘patriotic duty’, then I think I want to be unpatriotic.
Tagged advertising, change, consumerism, culture, current event, death, discernment, ethics, evil, justice, life, morals, politics, poverty, stewardship
I’ve quite enjoyed reading through “Is Nature Enough: Meaning and Truth in the Age of Science“, by John Haught. One of the many points he articulates well is what he refers to as “layered explanation”. Continue reading
