(Leftovers from a great and long chat with a good man today.)
Almost 100 years ago, Antonio Gramsci proposed the idea of “cultural hegemony” where a powerful idea or culture carries immense and controlling force. One key indicator that a hegemony is at work is when dissenting voices are kept silent out of fear.
A conservative ethic regarding homosexuality – and the homophobia (any level of social discomfort relating to homosexual people) that too often rides on its coattails – has been and can be often so strong in church (sub)cultures, that gay people feel suppressed and silenced out of fear of judgment. A homophobic hegemony pushing gays into closets.
The irony is this: a liberal/accepting ethic regarding homosexuality – and the angry angst that too often rides on its coattails – has been and can be often so strong in many post-Christian ‘developed’ contexts and culture, that conservatives also feel suppressed and silenced out of fear of judgment. A liberal hegemony pushing conservatives into cloisters.
Or in other words, for every action there is (often?) an equal-opposite reaction.
- Action – some conservative Christians heaped shame on people attracted to the same sex.
- Reaction – some liberal Westerners heaped shame on people who heaped shame on people attracted to the same sex.
As a Christian with a conservative ethic on homosexuality, rather than defensively fight for my ‘right to be conservative’, I’d rather go to the source, and oppose the homophobia which feeds the shaming and intimidation of people attracted to the same sex.
Physics, chemistry and biology (and culture) seem to set up a kind of bell curve of freedom over the course of any individual human life. The capacity for self-determination seems to emerge from invisibility, develop, climax, decline and disappear as we journey from zygote, foetus, infant, toddler, adult, mature adult, and finally at death.
The bodily equipment we possess does not provide us with complete and total freedom. We will never be free to do anything. Being fully human doesn’t need that anyway, it only needs freedom to do things that embody full humanness. But at any rate, human nature and human culture have not combined to get us to perfect freedom. The top of the bell curve may be a bit higher in some lives than others, but it never gets to perfection.
In this context, the question ‘do we have free will’ is easily answered: of course not. We are slaves – at least to some degree – to all manner of things, both in our nature and in culture. Processes, limitations, desires, needs, others, etc.
In Christianity, there is the tension between slavery to ‘sin’ and slavery to ‘righteousness’ (or Christ). The great irony is that the more ‘enslaved’ we are to the latter, the more free and truly human we are. The more you ‘chain’ yourself (through practicing and creating habits of mind and heart) to, for example, loving others as yourself, the more free you are to be human. Like all kinds of growth, growing in slavery to Christ is a process. Freedom, like all other aspects of salvation, is not experienced fully in the here and now. Every habit created, every neural pathway nudged – and re-nudged, is one more step toward the hope and goal of full freedom in a freed and recreated cosmos.
…because the creation itself also will be delivered from the slavery of corruption into the glorious freedom of the children of God. (Romans 8:21)
Posted in bible, christianity, culture, philosophy, theology
Tagged culture, free will, freedom, habits, nature, righteousness, sin, slavery
Friggin’ hilarious… and a bit true as well :)
Posted in general, philosophy, technology, www
Tagged busyness, complacency, consumerism, culture, life, technology, truth, web, wisdom
My wife and I were purchasing shoes at Hannah’s today (don’t ask), and felt empathy for the mother-of-teenaged-daughter, whom we overheard saying, “It’s school, not a fashion show…”
Among the many things no doubt blurring the distinction between the two would be Hannah’s latest catch phrase: “Life is your catwalk.”
…is sometimes found in surprising places.
This morning, a Breakfast programme discussed the less-than-commendable notion of borrowing funds to invest during a recession…
…and my wife just now walked in the door from a work-leaving do (for non-NZ readers, ‘do’ means ‘event’ or ‘party’), which involved walking through the Sky City building, and mentioned how surprised she was to see how busy the casino was.
Prof. John Stackhouse’s post (here) on the recent “bus campaigns” is quite good and balanced I think.
Apparently, the board of a Vancouver bus company has the following regulation on bus ads:
“No advertisement will be accepted which promotes or opposes a specific theology or religious ethic, point of view, policy or action.” Continue reading
Posted in philosophy, www
Tagged atheism, belief, consumerism, culture, current event, ethics, life, morals, religion, worldview
Recent US stimulus package = nearly a trillion US dollars.
Compare that with a comment I randomly saw on this post:
10% of 10 million US millionaires’ funds = a trillion US dollars.
American millionaires investing in the American economy? A novel concept indeed.
Full comment quote:
1 trillion is taking 10% of the net worth of ten million millionaires and yes 10 million millionaire households is about what we have in the United States as of 2009.
Oh my gosh, have we accidentally through the magic of math discovered how to stimulate the entire economy without increasing the debt to the tax payer? A one time flat tax, ooops I mean millionaire stimulus to invest in America, the wealthiest are known to spend the least hence lets re-allocate that money where it matters…
lol – now that is a joke, American millionaires investing in America.
((note: the comment below this one links to an article saying there are only 3 million millionaires in the US – but it’s still an interesting thought!))
Anyone who has a knee jerk (i.e. less than critical) reaction to political events in general and the recent U.S. stimulus package in particular, should shut up and think before ranting.
That said, I just don’t like the thought (much less the passing) of the new stimulus package (and I’m not at all anti-Obama – to be crystal clear). $US838 BILLION – on what I can’t help but see as a kind of massively over-sized whallop to a horse that is eventually going to die. Yes, I’m aware of the complexity to all this, and No, I don’t think there are any quick fixes. But I still cannot understand or begin to support spending nearly a trillion dollars on trying to preserve the “American Way of Life” ™.
What kind of precedent are we setting for future generations? What are we saying to the rest of the world – much of which is living in some mild or severe form of poverty; a different kind of poverty indeed to the ‘poverty’ some are facing in ‘developed’ nations around the world.
Some may think, “Oh, but financial prosperity for the ‘rich west’ will enable them to be generous to the ‘poor rest’…” That kind of capitalistic mentality (a.k.a. ‘the rising tide will lift many small boats’) is utter Bull. Greed does not engender generosity.
Instead of our bank account levels needing to go ‘up’, we need our standard of living to go ‘down’ to a realistic and sustainable place. And as long as ‘going out and spending money to stimulate the economy’ is part of doing your ‘patriotic duty’, then I think I want to be unpatriotic.
Posted in ethics, politics
Tagged advertising, change, consumerism, culture, current event, death, discernment, ethics, evil, justice, life, morals, politics, poverty, stewardship
Obama’s recent statements on the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, remind us all (like it or not) of the immensely divisive issue of abortion. The article says… Continue reading
Posted in ethics, philosophy
Tagged abortion, change, conflict, culture, current event, death, debate, dignity, ethics, humanity, humility, Law, life, morals, philosophy, politics, relationships, sexuality, truth, wisdom