Because it is.
There’s the infamous ‘hymns’ versus ‘choruses’ debate that still echoes around the church. But I think the new issue will be ‘liturgical’ v. ‘non-liturgical’ (or ‘free’?) debate.
I just preached a sermon which discussed ‘worship’ and suggested that we (Baptists) may need to review our approach. I made reference to some ‘liturgical’ forms of worship and briefly sketched how and why those forms are meaningful and not just empty ‘rituals’ ((I find it annoying that the word ritual is often associated with meaninglessness.)).
I was approached by two people after the service. The first, with glowing eyes and face, told me how much she loved what I was saying. The first words of the second person couldn’t have been more opposite: they suggested that if I wanted to be Anglican perhaps I should switch denominations.
I stuck with the conversation and it got better. But I was reminded once again that when it comes to worship, be prepared for very strong opinions!