<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: owned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=owned</link>
	<description>exploring the challenge of trusting &#38; obeying Jesus...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/comment-page-1/#comment-3682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/?p=943#comment-3682</guid>
		<description>Simon,
I appreicate you sharing your perspective.
I still think the notion of no &#039;other&#039; is still problematic - indeed impossible.  Relationships are about sharing - experiences, posessions, feelings, etc.  The more that is shared, the deeper the relationship is.  You can&#039;t share deeply or become &#039;one&#039; with thousands of people.  &#039;Marriage&#039; (consumated by the physical sexual union - whether or not a paper is signed or ceremony had) is a unique instance where the two are also one.

I like Tom Wright&#039;s description of Love in that Love a) respects the objective &#039;other-ness&#039; of the beloved (i.e. not forcing/coercing itself into/onto the &#039;other&#039; or vice-versa), whilst b) remaining in rich, subjective relationship to the beloved; Love &#039;transcends the objective/subjective divide&#039;.

My closest relationship is with my wife.  We remain individuals, but we share so much that there is a &#039;one-ness&#039; as well.  Both-and.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like or dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-3682" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3682', 'add', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-3682-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-3682" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3682', 'subtract', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-3682-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p><p>Simon,<br />
I appreicate you sharing your perspective.<br />
I still think the notion of no &#8216;other&#8217; is still problematic &#8211; indeed impossible.  Relationships are about sharing &#8211; experiences, posessions, feelings, etc.  The more that is shared, the deeper the relationship is.  You can&#8217;t share deeply or become &#8216;one&#8217; with thousands of people.  &#8216;Marriage&#8217; (consumated by the physical sexual union &#8211; whether or not a paper is signed or ceremony had) is a unique instance where the two are also one.</p>
<p>I like Tom Wright&#8217;s description of Love in that Love a) respects the objective &#8216;other-ness&#8217; of the beloved (i.e. not forcing/coercing itself into/onto the &#8216;other&#8217; or vice-versa), whilst b) remaining in rich, subjective relationship to the beloved; Love &#8216;transcends the objective/subjective divide&#8217;.</p>
<p>My closest relationship is with my wife.  We remain individuals, but we share so much that there is a &#8216;one-ness&#8217; as well.  Both-and.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/comment-page-1/#comment-3677</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/?p=943#comment-3677</guid>
		<description>Dale,

I really would invite you look further into Buddhis/Eastern practise. I belong to a practical philosophy club and it has really opened my eyes.
If you think about the relationships in your life, Dale, I&#039;m sure you will be able to see that it is in your closest relationships that the me/you line is most blurred; &lt;i&gt;identity&lt;/i&gt; is the most fused. And the more identity is fused, the more empathy is there. In this way, it is as our identities with people become fused - our blurring between them vs. us - that we can truly have empathy, and have right relationship to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like or dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-3677" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3677', 'add', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-3677-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-3677" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3677', 'subtract', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-3677-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p><p>Dale,</p>
<p>I really would invite you look further into Buddhis/Eastern practise. I belong to a practical philosophy club and it has really opened my eyes.<br />
If you think about the relationships in your life, Dale, I&#8217;m sure you will be able to see that it is in your closest relationships that the me/you line is most blurred; <i>identity</i> is the most fused. And the more identity is fused, the more empathy is there. In this way, it is as our identities with people become fused &#8211; our blurring between them vs. us &#8211; that we can truly have empathy, and have right relationship to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/comment-page-1/#comment-3668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/?p=943#comment-3668</guid>
		<description>Simon,
Yes, my friend is Buddhist, so naturally would have an &#039;Eastern&#039; flavour - though not all &#039;eastern&#039; thought is identical.  And I&#039;m sorry, but I&#039;d have to say that if there are &#039;no real others&#039;, then it&#039;s not so much that &#039;relationship becomes whole&#039; as much as that relationship becomes nothing.  And as for being in &#039;right relationship&#039; to things, I think it is essential to retain respect for (and appreciation of) the &#039;other-ness&#039; of those things.

As for the Fight Club quote, however, I love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like or dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-3668" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3668', 'add', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-3668-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-3668" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3668', 'subtract', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-3668-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p><p>Simon,<br />
Yes, my friend is Buddhist, so naturally would have an &#8216;Eastern&#8217; flavour &#8211; though not all &#8216;eastern&#8217; thought is identical.  And I&#8217;m sorry, but I&#8217;d have to say that if there are &#8216;no real others&#8217;, then it&#8217;s not so much that &#8216;relationship becomes whole&#8217; as much as that relationship becomes nothing.  And as for being in &#8216;right relationship&#8217; to things, I think it is essential to retain respect for (and appreciation of) the &#8216;other-ness&#8217; of those things.</p>
<p>As for the Fight Club quote, however, I love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/2009/12/owned/comment-page-1/#comment-3559</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/?p=943#comment-3559</guid>
		<description>Dale,

Your friend&#039;s notion of there being no real other is quite Eastern. I think that - quite the contrary to &lt;i&gt;relationships&lt;/i&gt; being impossible - it is only when we realise that there are no real others that relationship becomes whole. For it is only when we treat others and everything within &quot;Gaia&quot; as part of our self that we are in right relationship to these things.

I love a quote from an equally brilliant Movie &lt;i&gt;Fight Club&lt;/i&gt;: &lt;i&gt;&quot;The things you own end up owning you&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like or dislike: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="up-3559" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3559', 'add', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_');" title="Thumb up" /> <span id="karma-3559-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" id="down-3559" src="http://www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/1_14_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('3559', 'subtract', 'www.fruitfulfaith.net/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '1_14_')" title="Thumb down" /> <span id="karma-3559-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p><p>Dale,</p>
<p>Your friend&#8217;s notion of there being no real other is quite Eastern. I think that &#8211; quite the contrary to <i>relationships</i> being impossible &#8211; it is only when we realise that there are no real others that relationship becomes whole. For it is only when we treat others and everything within &#8220;Gaia&#8221; as part of our self that we are in right relationship to these things.</p>
<p>I love a quote from an equally brilliant Movie <i>Fight Club</i>: <i>&#8220;The things you own end up owning you&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

